OWASP API Top 10 2023: Risks and How to Mitigate Them

OWASP Top 10 API Security Risks and How to Mitigate Them

API1:2023: Broken Object Level Authorization

Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) occurs when an API fails to enforce proper access controls at the object level, allowing unauthorized users to access or manipulate sensitive data. It arises due to inadequate authorization checks on endpoints that handle object identifiers. Attackers exploit these weaknesses by manipulating object IDs to gain unauthorized access to data they should not be able to view or modify.

How to mitigate:

To mitigate BOLA, developers must implement authorization checks for every function that accesses a data source using an identifier from the user. These checks should verify that the requester has the necessary permissions to perform actions on the specified object.

Additionally, using non-guessable identifiers like UUIDs can reduce the risk of ID-based attacks.

Regular security audits and penetration testing can help identify and address instances of broken object level authorization. Ensuring comprehensive logging and monitoring of access patterns also aids in detecting and responding to unauthorized access attempts.

API2:2023: Broken Authentication

Broken authentication occurs when API authentication mechanisms are improperly implemented, allowing attackers to compromise user accounts or sensitive data. Common issues include weak password policies, flawed session management, and incorrect implementation of authentication protocols. Attackers can exploit these weaknesses to gain unauthorized access, often using techniques like credential stuffing or brute-force attacks.

How to mitigate:

To mitigate broken authentication risks, it’s crucial to enforce strong password policies and implement multi-factor authentication (MFA). Proper session management is also essential; sessions should be securely generated and invalidated after logout. APIs should use secure storage for credentials and tokens, ensuring they are encrypted both in transit and at rest.

Regular security assessments and code reviews can help identify vulnerabilities in the authentication process. Automated tools can be used to test for common flaws such as weak passwords or token mismanagement.

API3:2023: Broken Object Property Level Authorization

Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA) is a critical security issue that arises when an API fails to enforce proper access controls at the property level of an object. This allows attackers to exploit endpoints to read, modify, or delete sensitive properties of objects without authorization.

How to mitigate:

BOPLA combines aspects of excessive data exposure and mass assignment, focusing on unauthorized interactions with individual properties rather than entire objects. To mitigate BOPLA risks, developers must implement strict property-level access controls. This involves ensuring that each property within an object is validated against the user’s permissions before any read or write operations are allowed.

APIs should only expose necessary properties and use allowlists to filter out any unauthorized data from requests and responses. Regular security testing and code reviews are essential in identifying potential BOPLA vulnerabilities. Automated tools can help in scanning for excessive data exposure and improper authorization checks at the property level.

API4:2023: Unrestricted Resource Consumption

Unrestricted resource consumption, also known as resource exhaustion, occurs when an API fails to implement limits on the usage of critical resources such as CPU, memory, bandwidth, or storage. Attackers exploit this vulnerability by sending a high volume of requests or large payloads, consuming excessive amounts of system resources. This can lead to degraded performance or unavailability of the API service.

How to mitigate:

Mitigating unrestricted resource consumption involves rate limiting and throttling mechanisms. Rate limiting restricts the number of requests a client can make in a given time frame, while throttling controls the rate at which requests are processed. These measures help ensure that no single client can overwhelm the system, maintaining service availability and performance.

APIs should enforce strict input validation to limit payload sizes and complexity. This includes setting maximum size constraints on request bodies and parameters. Regular monitoring and alerting for unusual patterns in resource usage can also help detect and mitigate potential attacks early.

API5:2023: Broken Function Level Authorization

Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) occurs when APIs fail to enforce proper authorization checks at the function or operation level. This allows attackers to access sensitive functions, such as administrative endpoints or other users’ data. Complex access control policies, involving various roles and user hierarchies, often contribute to these flaws.

How to mitigate:

Properly segregating administrative and regular functions is crucial in mitigating this risk. To prevent BFLA, implement authorization mechanisms that validate user permissions for each function call. Ensure that every API endpoint has clearly defined access controls aligned with the least privilege principle.

Regular audits and testing help identify and rectify any gaps in authorization logic. Additionally, adopting a zero-trust security model can further enhance protection against BFLA by continuously verifying user identities and their access rights before granting permissions.

API6:2023: Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows

APIs vulnerable to unrestricted access to sensitive business flows expose critical business functionalities without adequate controls. This can include operations like placing orders, transferring funds, or accessing customer data. Attackers exploit these APIs by automating their interactions, often using bots or scripts, to perform actions that can disrupt services or cause financial loss.

How to mitigate:

To mitigate this risk, implement strict rate limiting and monitoring mechanisms. Rate limiting helps control the number of requests an API can handle within a specific timeframe, preventing abuse through automated attacks. Monitoring allows for real-time detection of unusual patterns or behaviors indicative of malicious activity.

Strong authentication and authorization checks are also crucial. Ensuring that only authenticated users with the appropriate permissions can access sensitive business flows reduces the likelihood of unauthorized exploitation. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring more than one form of verification.

API7:2023: Server Side Request Forgery

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when an attacker manipulates a server to make unauthorized requests to unintended locations. This vulnerability typically arises when an API endpoint fetches remote resources based on user-supplied inputs without proper validation. Attackers can exploit SSRF to access internal systems, bypassing firewalls and other network defenses.

An SSRF attack can be particularly dangerous because it allows attackers to interact with internal services that are not exposed to the public Internet. For example, an attacker might use SSRF to query internal APIs, access metadata services on cloud platforms, or scan the internal network for vulnerabilities. This can lead to data breaches or further compromise of internal assets.

How to mitigate:

Mitigating SSRF involves validating and sanitizing user inputs, ensuring URLs are allowlisted, and avoiding direct network calls based on user-supplied data. Developers should also use secure coding practices like restricting the types of addresses that can be connected to and employing network segmentation to limit potential damage from compromised components.

API8:2023: Security Misconfiguration

Security misconfiguration is a prevalent issue in API security, often arising from default settings, incomplete configurations, or lack of proper hardening. Common examples include leaving unnecessary features enabled, using outdated software versions, and failing to secure cloud storage. These gaps can provide attackers easy access to sensitive data and systems.

How to mitigate:

To mitigate security misconfiguration risks, organizations should implement a thorough configuration management process. This includes regularly updating software components, disabling unused features and services, and following industry best practices for secure configurations. Automation tools can help enforce these configurations consistently across environments.

Additionally, performing regular security audits and penetration testing can identify misconfigurations before they are exploited. Continuous monitoring of configuration changes ensures that deviations from the secure baseline are promptly detected and corrected.

API9:2023: Improper Inventory Management

APIs often expose numerous endpoints, making it challenging to maintain an accurate and current inventory. Improper inventory management can result in outdated or insecure API versions remaining in production, increasing the risk of security breaches. Without an accurate inventory, it’s difficult to track which APIs are active, deprecated, or require updates.

How to mitigate:

Mitigating this risk involves implementing automated tools for API discovery and monitoring. These tools can continuously scan the environment to detect all active APIs, ensuring that any deprecated or vulnerable endpoints are identified and addressed promptly. Regular audits should also be conducted to verify the accuracy of the API inventory.

Maintaining detailed documentation for each API version is crucial. This documentation should include information about each endpoint’s purpose, security requirements, and update history.

API10:2023: Unsafe Consumption of APIs

Developers often trust data received from third-party APIs more than user input, leading to weaker security standards. This misplaced trust can result in vulnerabilities when the data is not properly validated or sanitized. Attackers exploit this by targeting integrated third-party services, which may have less stringent security measures compared to the primary API.

Another aspect of unsafe consumption involves the usage of insecure protocols for API communication. If developers do not enforce secure transport mechanisms like HTTPS, sensitive data can be intercepted during transmission. This opens up possibilities for man-in-the-middle attacks where attackers can eavesdrop or manipulate data being exchanged.

How to mitigate:

Improper handling of API responses can also lead to unauthorized access and data exposure. When APIs consume responses without adequate checks, attackers can manipulate these responses to gain access to restricted areas or sensitive information within the application. Proper validation and sanitization of all incoming and outgoing data are crucial for mitigating these risks.

API Security with CyCognito

CyCognito is an exposure management platform that reduces risk by discovering, testing and prioritizing security issues. The platform scans billions of websites, cloud applications and APIs and uses advanced AI to identify the most critical risks and guide remediation.

Emerging companies, government agencies and Fortune 500 organizations rely on CyCognito to secure and protect from growing threats.

Want to see how it works?

• Check out our website and explore our platform with a self-guided, interactive dashboard product tour.
• To learn how CyCognito can help you understand your external attack surface and exposed risks, please visit our Contact Us page to schedule a demo.