Organizations are unaware of 10-30% of their subsidiaries, leaving substantial portions of the attack surface in the dark. CyCognito starts by mapping your organization and continuously updates it as your business changes.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Fails to look at the organization’s business structure or map the attack surface, leaving you to try to map things manually | Uses natural language processing, machine learning, and a graph data model to automatically map the organization, identify subsidiaries, and ensure discovery of forgotten and under-managed internet-exposed attack vectors |
Requires pre-knowledge of IP-address ranges, missing assets that create significant risks | Goes beyond owned environments, covering traditional data centers, SaaS, IaaS, partners, brands, acquired companies, joint ventures, and cloud environments |
Can’t show risk on the subsidiary or regional level and fails to identify critical areas for security investment and improvement | Identifies underperforming subsidiaries and creates a plan to improve their security posture |
Your attack surface fluctuates constantly, growing and shrinking by up to 10% monthly. Stay on top of changes with CyCognito’s continuous monitoring – no management required.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Requires lists of known assets and extensive manual work, missing hidden assets and key risks | Zero-input, zero-seeds, zero configuration, and zero onboarding |
Leaves attack surface out of date and incomplete without costly and time-consuming manual updates | Uses OSINT-based reconnaissance techniques to attribute and contextualize the entire attack surface and identify unknown unknowns |
Actively and non-intrusively test for tens of thousands of issues across 35+ testing categories with CyCognito.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Relies solely on passive scanning technologies that fail to accurately identify issues, requiring your team to verify findings | Leverages tens of thousands of active and passive tests, identifying actual risks to your attack surface with high confidence and fidelity |
Misses important risks that require active interaction with a system, like use of default credentials and sensitive data exposure | Covers key risk areas like the OWASP Top 10 for web apps, identification of weak credentials, exploitable vulnerabilities, security controls, and data exposure |
Lacks dynamic application security testing (DAST) | Identifies key risks affecting web applications using DAST |
CyCognito’s testing tools rigorously assess the state of your security infrastructure.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Tests only a fraction of your assets a fraction of the time | Continuously uncovers and evaluates the gaps in the security controls across 100% of your exposed assets |
Does not identify Zero Trust gaps, authentication issues, or injection vulnerabilities | Finds critical gaps like missing Zero Trust protections, exposed data, lack of SSO/CAPTCHA, lack of cookie consent, authentication issues, injection vulnerabilities, and more |
Lacks organization mapping and subsidiary discovery, making it impossible to compare coverage and implementation across business units | Compares coverage and implementation across business units, flagging assets that lack important protections like web application firewalls (WAFs) |
Hundreds of contextual data points gathered through the CyCognito discovery and testing phases are combined to prioritize issues based on your business context.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Primarily relies on CVSS or EPSS to prioritize issues | Goes beyond CVSS and EPSS with unique risk-based prioritization analysis |
Doesn’t incorporate business impact or context | Incorporates factors like tactical threat intelligence, asset discoverability, asset attractiveness, exploitability, business impact, and remediation complexity |
Flags over 3% of issues as critical, leaving your security teams chasing after low-risk issues and delaying mean time to remediation for critical vulnerabilities | Flags less than 0.1% of issues as critical, focusing your remediation efforts on the issues that matter most |
Simplify your remediation workflow with automatic and on-demand remediation validation and improve mean time to remediate (MTTR) by as much as 88%.
Other EASM |
|
---|---|
Requires manual validation to identify failed remediation attempts | Reduces time to remediation with step-by-step remediation guidance, while automatic remediation validation checks for misconfigurations or errors |
Lacks innovative tools and workflows | Boosts credibility with verifiable evidence of every risk and documented ownership for every asset, and equip your red team or pen-testers with exploitation and validation tools |
Don‘t take our word for it. Hear what our customers say:
*As of January 2025, compared with Microsoft Defender EASM, Crowdstrike Falcon Surface, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Google Mandiant Advantage ASM, and Bitsight CRM, based on a sample size of 231 reviews.
Close your security gaps with CyCognito's zero-input discovery, automated testing, and risk-based prioritization of your attack surface.
Answer a few questions and receive an instant custom report sharing how you can reduce costs and boost your efficiency with CyCognito.